1 – get together a band of a few hundred protesters; more if possible

2 – get them to form groups of three. Each group founds a new made-up religion, with a leader, creed and somewhat fleshed-out mythic narrative. It would be pretty cool if some of these were in themselves satirical of/offensive to other, older made-up religions, but it’s more important that they each be clearly distinguishable from each other. Each religion sets up it’s own website.

3 – The adherents of each religion publish webpages, pamphlets, songs, youtube videos or other media, individually blaspheming, outrageously and egregiously, against each of the other religions participating in the protest – ideally containing, at some point, an explicit statement that the adherents of the religion in question are a) intended to be offended, and b) cunts.

4 – Everyone prosecutes everyone else for blasphemous libel. This generates P many frivolous, time-wasting prosecutions, according to the following formula, where N is the total of participants in the protest:

P = ((N/3)-1)^2

So, if you have 303 participants, you have 10,000 prosecutions. If you have 3003, that’s 1,000,000 prosecutions. Enough to completely clog up the courts for a very, very long time … unless of course the law is repealed, or some judge finds a pretext to dismiss the prosecutions en bloc, and in so doing sets a legal precedent that effectively de-claws the clause.

Other fun projects would be getting Satanists to prosecute churches, and goading existing churches into prosecuting, then insisting that God press charges in person. Hilarity ensues.

A while back, I was contemplating the possibility – or lack of it – to legislate regarding intent to cause fear, as in intent to bully.. I think its very hard to establish, so it comes down to activities we take to mean one thing or the other..