Comments on: Undercover Mosque Police complaint a “publicity stunt” http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/08/16/undercover-mosque-police-complaint-a-publicity-stunt/ Watching. Pointing. Laughing. Wed, 01 Aug 2012 20:22:20 +0000 hourly 1 By: mediawatchwatch.org.uk » Newsnight supports Undercover Mosque http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/08/16/undercover-mosque-police-complaint-a-publicity-stunt/comment-page-1/#comment-120625 Fri, 12 Oct 2007 21:39:44 +0000 http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=771#comment-120625 […] 4 documentary Undercover Mosque, and found that those allegations were groundless – something that informed commentators have long […]

]]>
/** * Fires at the end of each RSS2 comment feed item. * * @since WP-2.1.0 * * @param int $comment->comment_ID The ID of the comment being displayed. * @param int $comment_post->ID The ID of the post the comment is connected to. */ do_action( 'commentrss2_item', $comment->comment_ID, $comment_post->ID ); ?>
By: GagWatch » Silly burkas http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/2007/08/16/undercover-mosque-police-complaint-a-publicity-stunt/comment-page-1/#comment-115710 Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:53:15 +0000 http://www.mediawatchwatch.org.uk/?p=771#comment-115710 s rules state that “Fairness and Privacy” complaints can come only from “the person affected” or someone authorised to act for them. The West Midlands Police is neither, so the complaint will not even be considered. [...]]]> […] Media Watch Watch points out that Ofcom’s rules state that “Fairness and Privacy” complaints can come only from “the person affected” or someone authorised to act for them. The West Midlands Police is neither, so the complaint will not even be considered. […]

]]>
/** * Fires at the end of each RSS2 comment feed item. * * @since WP-2.1.0 * * @param int $comment->comment_ID The ID of the comment being displayed. * @param int $comment_post->ID The ID of the post the comment is connected to. */ do_action( 'commentrss2_item', $comment->comment_ID, $comment_post->ID ); ?>